Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog

Archive for the ‘Naked Men’ Category

It’s been a while since I put any hot pics up so here’s a few quick photos for your viewing pleasure.

They’re all at For The Girls, of course.

I think Ewan McGregor is gorgeous and he has long been a favourite actor of mine due to his eagerness to get his gear off in films. I think he should win an award for “Most Full Frontal Male Nude Scenes”.

Now he’s told Out magazine that he doesn’t mind kissing guys on set because it “gets his blood up.”

Talking about kissing Jonathan Rhys Meyers in ‘Velvet Goldmine’, Ewan told Out magazine: “I remember when I kissed Johnny. It was just a rush at the end of the day. It was just an electrical moment, because you look around and some of the British electrician guys – who are all mainly closeted homosexuals, I think – were sitting around going ‘F**k, no.’

But I like kissing boys on screen. As a straight guy, it’s quite an interesting proposition. Anything on a film set that takes you by surprise like that, that gets your blood up, is good.

“I’m always interested in playing different people, in different situations. It doesn’t matter to me whether someone is in love with a man or a woman. I find the idea of love and romance interesting. I’m a sucker for it. I like playing someone who’s falling in love because I like the sensation of it.”

If we get Ewan nude in some kind of gay romance film I think it will make millions. Just so long as the other guy isn’t Charlie from Long Way Round.

Previous post: Ewan McGregor: Our Nude Hero

My, what a huge… present you have.

Happy Christmas to everyone.

It’s been a while since I posted a sexy pic.

I like this one because it makes me wonder what this hunky guy with the nice butt is preparing. This photo makes me hungry, as it were.

What to make of this photo. It’s a guy masturbating in a slightly acrobatic position and ejaculating onto his own face. Is it sexy or not?

I’ve already stated my objection to the ubiquitousness and sexism that seems inherent in many facial cumshots in porn. I do hate that bit where the woman kneels and looks stupid while the guy jerks off and ejaculates on her face.

But a guy doing it to himself? I think it could be very sexy. The idea of a man who tastes his own come or who isn’t afraid to go down on a girl after he’s had an orgasm is hot. I think it implies that the guy is accepting of himself and his sexuality.

This hunky guy looks just a tiny little bit like Twilight star Robert Pattinson. So if you’ve got a bit of a thing for him, he might make a reasonable substitute. Personally, I just think he’s a cute guy. Look at those “fuck me” eyes!

Full set of photos available at For The Girls

Girls, meet Gabriel. He’s very cute and one of my favourite models. I think he looks a little bit like Orlando Bloom.

And yes, that is his humungous penis, it hasn’t been photoshopped on.

You’ll find the full set of pics at For The Girls.

If you’ve got a thing for very thin, gothy-looking, half-naked men then you’ll be pleased to discover the Home For Lost Boys. It’s a relatively new membership site featuring galleries of “alternative, beautiful, non-mainstream boys” and it does seem to be aimed at women.

The FAQ says that they’re not necessarily a porn site:

The site focuses on sensual, rather than explicit, content. None of our models are required to show full frontal nudity, though some chose to do so. Photographers and models have been blurring the line between art and porn for years, and we seek to further that movement. We don’t seek to exclude sexuality, but it is only one aspect of our models’ work, along with artistic and self- expression.

The photos are occasionally amateur-looking but they do have a certain arty flair. If you like earnest authenticity then it’s here in spades and a lot of the guys have lovely faces.

Fashion and design magazine Wallpaper* has gone out on a limb by offering a cover featuring a “peelable” naked man. The cover starts out all very clothed, but you can then peel back a sticker and the rather handsome guy on the cover is totally naked.

It’s a lovely idea and one I’d like to see more of. I’m sure the girls at Erotica Cover Watch will be very pleased. I’ll also be interested to see how well the whole thing sells.

Interestingly, the Guardian’s coverage of the cover focuses on the cost and logistics of the whole thing. There’s no commentary whatsoever about the fact that the man is naked, no typical hysteria about “porn” or the corruption of children or (insert moral panic here).

Is it because it’s a fashion magazine? Are people making the assumption that the naked man is aimed at gay consumers – and only gay men read fashion mags? Or is it lacking in headlines because the bogans don’t normally go near that kind of magazine and thus haven’t noticed it or complained?

* No, really, dahlings. “Wallpaper*” with an asterisk is how you write it. And say it, obviously. I’m always saying things with a silent asterisk. Like now*.

Erotica authors (and book cover crusaders) Kristina Lloyd and Mathilde Madden have written a great piece in the Guardian discussing the difficulties Filament has had in printing erect dicks.

I liked this bit:

When set against the plethora of men’s lifestyle and top-shelf magazines featuring scantily clad and open-legged women, the struggles faced by Filament highlight a deeply entrenched sexism: men can look at women but women cannot look at men.

Attempts to even out this disparity often lead to cries that two wrongs don’t make a right; that countering the prevalence of eroticised women by adding men to the mix legitimises sexist objectification. But there’s nothing inherently sexist about depicting nudity. It’s sexist when only women are deemed to signify the erotic; it’s sexist when eroticised images of women are so normalised and widespread that women stand to be viewed first and foremost as sex objects – their value inextricably linked to their sexual desirability. The sexism is in the inequality.

As much as I support Filament in their quest to get dicks onto newsagent shelves, part of me is pondering the fuss. How is it that the print world is so fucking outdated? I’ve been publishing photos of naked men with erect cocks since the year 2000. No government interference, no printing issues, no distribution hassles, no sexist male penpushers getting all nervous about the prospect of peen. Just me and my server and my FTP program.

And yet that has never been deemed newsworthy. I’ve been participating in a publishing revolution for almost a decade and yet here we are still hung up on what’s considered suitable to print on paper. How extraordinarily strange.

And how is it, in two thousand and fucking nine, that people can be spooked by photos of erections? What? How? Why? WHY?

This is Australian chat show host Rove McManus and the excitingly fashionable outfit that Bruno got him to wear.

I think we need more knitted nude suits on TV. Especially MALE nude suits. Hilarious.

Here’s a promo video I made for For The Girls. My favourite is the slow motion hottie at the end. And there’s just something about guys reaching into their pants that I find rather sexy. Can you tell?

Here’s a bit of male eye candy to spice up the blog a bit.

More pics of this gorgeous guy here.

Cute Carlos shows off his lovely smile in this gallery

The Independent has a piece about a new women’s erotica magazine being launched in the UK. It’s called Filament and it’s tagline is “the thinking woman’s crumpet.”

Suraya Singh is yet another woman who felt that porn wasn’t offering her what she needed so she’s made her own. She’s got fairly negative things to say about existing women’s erotica, so she’s put me offside somewhat, but all power to her for doing a whole bunch of research into what women want to see.

The Filament version of “what women want” is not Playgirl-style beefcake but “toned men with oval-shaped, often quite feminine faces.” The first issue of the mag features pictorials of said men, found through asking guys on the street if they wanted to pose. There’s no full frontal nudity, although that possibility hasn’t been ruled out.

I do applaud the mag for their list of what they won’t do: diets, celebrities, “men are from mars, women from venus” crap, makeovers, shopping etc. Sounds like the old Australian Women’s Forum ethic that I always found so appealing.

Naysayer Rowan Pelling says he believes making erotica for women is “notoriously difficult.” I do enjoy it when people say that. It thins the herd.

What’s puzzling me is this: why take a risk with a hard copy magazine? If this journal is supposed to be wank material, they’re pushing shit uphill. Meatworld porn just can’t compete with the privacy and instant, easy availability of internet porn. Even if your nude guys have feminine faces. And if you’re not even going to show peen, forget it.

So, what would inspire a woman to buy a magazine with semi-nude male pics in it and wait for it to arrive in the post? I’m really thinking it’s gonna have to be something along the lines of “artistic” in the same way that Black + White magazine can do arty nudes. Then you can buy the thing and just admire the shadowy moody photography and put it on your coffee table.

Either that or the pictorials are a few sexy pages to flick past on your way to the interesting articles, which in the Playboy tradition, is what you’ve really bought the magazine for (no, really, you do). Thankfully, the sample article on the site discussing the ethics of pornography looks well worth reading.

A few years ago Sweet Action was touted as the hip new thing in porn for women. They only made it to 3 issues. I’m very interested to see if Filament can stay the distance.

Once again I’m neglecting my blog in favour of Twitter, so here’s a lovely naked man photo to keep you amused. I was perusing some older pics today and found this photo of Sebastian. It’s one of my favourites.

You’ll find the full set at For The Girls.