Monthly: October 2011

19 Oct

1 Comment

Off To The Berlin Porn Film Festival 2011

by

Berlin Porn Film Festival 2011It’s a bit much really. Just weeks after coming home from a holiday in France I’m about to fly back to Europe to attend the Berlin Porn Film Festival. It’s costing me way too much money and I’m not looking forward to another 23 hours on a plane but I felt like I’d be missing an important opportunity if I didn’t go.

My short film The Thought Of Her is screening in the Female Porn session (Thu 27/10 at 13:45 and again on Sat 29/10 at 19:45) and my essay on feminist porn was recently published in the German film magazine Schnitt to co-incide with the festival.

On top of that, I’m keen to meet feminist porn legends Tristan Taormino, Jiz Lee and Nico Noelle, among others. I’ll also be catching up with filmmaker friends Jennifer Lyon Bell, Anna Span and Petra Joy. I’m also really hoping to shoot some erotic content when I’m in Berlin. Nothing has been planned but given the cheerful and easygoing vibe of the festival, it’s a real possibility. If nothing else, I’ll shoot some interviews and other footage for small documentaries.

I’ve been to the Berlin Porn Film Festival twice before, in 2008 and 2009. The latter was especially fabulous, as you can see in the little doco I made about it:

The festival is one of the few opportunities to meet with and discuss emerging ideas about porn, film and sexuality. It’s not a commercial expo like the Venus exhibition which was on a couple of weeks ago in the same city. Instead, it’s a more intellectual and artistic endeavour and one that is becoming increasingly popular. There’s something very liberating about sitting in a packed theatre and watching dirty movies with other people. It’s such a shame we can’t do anything like it here in Australia due to our ridiculous censorship laws (although change may be on the horizon, fingers crossed).

In any case, I’ll be scarce for a couple of weeks. When I come back, I plan to finally kickstart my filmmaking plans and hopefully have a real feature finished in 2012.

19 Oct

1 Comment

Porn Research: Younger Women More Likely To Use Porn

by

In February I met Dr Clarissa Smith who told me about the massive research project into porn that she was undertaking with collegues Feona Attwood and Martin Barker. Not long after they put out the call for porn users to participate in their survey which aimed to look at porn use in a non-judgemental way.

They received 5,490 responses to their questionaire and a heap of extended emails. They’re currently working their way through a mountain of information (over 1.2 million words) and expect it will take some time to reach any extensive conclusions. Nonetheless, they’ve put out a preliminary report of the survey, with some useful statistics and information.

Naturally I was interested in their demographic data, particularly when it came to women. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the survey threw up the same “one third” figure that repeatedly appears in statistics about porn. In this case, 31.6% of respondents were female, a figure that is pretty similar to the Nielsen Netratings’ 2003 report which is regularly quoted in the media (and on this blog). What’s really interesting is how much age is a factor in porn use for women:

Percentages of women using porn

As you can see, women aged 18-25 are far more likely to use porn than their older counterparts.

The authors make this interesting point:

What we can’t tell,from this snapshot, is whether this is simply a ‘passing phase’ for them, or whether it signals that wider generational shift we think we have identified – something which over time will reduce the overall differences between male and female interest in pornography.

It’s only an opinion (and largely anecdotal) but I think they’re on the right track. From what I’ve seen online, today’s young women have no problem with porn and a lot of them embrace it just as easily as their male friends. Previously there’s been a cultural difference in how women were brought up – there was no entrenched culture of sharing porn among the women of twenty or even ten years ago. Now, with the ubiquity of online porn, the male-female divide has weakened.

Of course, the majority of porn is still aimed at men and I think that partly accounts for the disparity in usage rates between men and women.

The report goes on to say that men attach more importance to porn and use it more frequently. When it comes to why people use porn, simple sexual gratification was the most popular reason. A user feels horny, they satisfy the urge with porn. Interestingly, they also found that a lot more women used porn to induce arousal than men.

Among the other results: DVDs are on the way out, tube sites are hugely popular and pop-up ads don’t convince people to look at porn. Also, amateur porn sites are far more popular than a lot of upmarket studio-produced porn sites.

I can’t wait to see the extended results. It will be incredibly useful to have this kind of research available, especially as there really isn’t enough unbiased information about porn use out there.

18 Oct

0 Comments

Anti Porn Rhetoric Lacks Solid Evidence

by

Pornland coverI’d like to thank ethicist Leslie Cannold for writing this on her blog today. It’s an excerpt from a longer essay called Pornography’s Effects: The Need for Solid Evidence by Ronald Weitzer. You can read the full thing here.

The essay, published in the journal Violence Against Women, points out that a lot of the rhetoric of Gail Dines and other anti-porn campaigners is not backed up by any solid established evidence. Instead, they rely on anecdotes, generalisations and assumptions.

It’s best if you read the whole thing for yourself but here’s a few choice paragraphs:

To evaluate these claims, it is crucial to ask if there is supporting evidence. Like Boyle’s book, Dines’ is evidence-thin. Although Dines cites a handful of academic studies, vir- tually the entire book is based on anecdotal information: (a) quotations from some men and women who attend Dines’ lectures; (b) her descriptions of some porn websites; (c) statements from a handful of actors and producers whom Dines met at the annual Adult Expo convention in Las Vegas; and (d) her accounts of selected scenes in porno- graphic videos. How does Dines use this impressionistic material and what alternative sources would be superior?

First, Dines did not conduct a systematic and rigorous review of porn websites or scenes, nor does she cite studies that do so. Neither are readers told how many websites or scenes she examined, nor how they were selected. Did she view 20 scenes or 2,000? She claims that they were representative—“these images are all too representative of what is out there on the Internet and in mass-produced movies” (p. xxi)—but we have no basis for believing that they were. With so much porn available today on the Internet and elsewhere, how could we ever construct a random sample from this universe to reach generalizable conclusions?

Second, grand generalizations are made throughout the book. Dines frequently refers to “men,” “women,” the “porn industry,” “fans,” and “performers” as monolithic categories. Also troubling is the jarring use of terms such as “never,” always,” “usually,” and “most.” Similarly, nowhere does she define some frequently used terms: “degrading,” “dehuman- izing,” or “empathy.” She does give examples of acts that she considers inherently degrad- ing; these include anal sex, ejaculation on a woman’s body, two or more men having sex with one woman, and multiorifice intercourse. Whether these acts are indeed perceived as degrading by viewers and actors does not figure into Dines’ argument. They are simply defined as perverted by fiat.

Third, nothing is said about gay male porn, lesbian porn, alternative porn, porn made by women—which, together, constitute a sizeable share of the market. A small but growing literature on these genres shatters Dines’ sweeping claims about “porn” (see Bakehorn, 2010; Collins, 1998; DeVoss, 2002; Stychin, 1992; Thomas, 2010; Tucker, 1991). The prolifera- tion of alternative genres renders any generalizations about “porn” ludicrous.
…..
Fourth, Dines acknowledges that there is very little data on actual porn consumers— those who watch porn in the real world (vs. in laboratory experiments)—but then proceeds to make many far-reaching claims about them. She writes that the “men who speak to me are not that different from the general population of men who use pornography,” but her source for the latter is another antiporn writer, journalist Pamela Paul (p. 89). Dines did not conduct a survey or in-depth interviews with a sample (let alone a representative sample) of consumers. A particularly troubling aspect of the book is her quotations from men and women who have spoken to her during and after her lectures. Blocks of sentences are quoted verbatim, bracketed by quotation marks, without indicating how these statements were recorded. How can readers have confidence that these statements were actually made by individuals with whom she had conversations? Was Dines somehow able to remember verbatim student statements consisting of two to four sentences at a time?

I think this article is incredibly useful and relevant – especially given that it is in a journal that looks at actual violence against women. Next time Gail Dines and her anti-porn cohorts wheel out their standard arguments, I’ll be linking to this essay. It does an excellent job of rebuttal in one easy swoop.

I am eagerly awaiting the publication of research by Dr Clarissa Smith and colleagues. They actually listened to porn 5,490 consumers via online questionaires. Understandably, it will take a while for the full results to emerge but they’ve uploaded some preliminary data here.

Filed Under: Porn

Tags: , ,

17 Oct

0 Comments

Hello Lelo Lyla: Motion-Controlled Buzzy Fun

by

Today I was lucky enough to receive a brand new Lelo Lyla SenseMotion vibrator via an unsuspecting courier. Having battled my way through layers of sticky tape, I finally opened the sleek black box. Inside, nestled amid oh-so-snazzy black velvet, were two rose-coloured objects, neither of which looked anything like a vibrator.

“What’s that?” my lovely husband asked.

“Wait and see,” I said, thinking I’d show him how they worked. Except I had absolutely no idea about that. These little things could well be the first sex toy for which I’ve needed an instruction manual.

Lyla vibrator in its nice box

The Lyla is a plug-like vibrating device with a string attached. It can be used on the clit or inserted. It’s controlled via the little round disc which also vibrates. The idea is that your partner controls the speed and intensity of the vibration, turning your average buzzy session into a playful tease-fest. Aside from 9 different buzz settings, the disc also reacts to motion, which makes things rather interesting.

At last, someone has found something useful to do with a motion detector. Never mind catching burglars… now we can get off on it. Although I must admit, having your burglar alarm attached to an internal vibrator would certainly make break-ins a hell of a lot more fun.

The above video seems to suggest that the Lelo SenseMotion vibrators are liable to induce seriously bad dancing in white guys. I guess it’s a risk we’ll all have to take.

I haven’t yet taken my new Lyla for a test run but I’ll be reviewing it for For The Girls in the near future.

Filed Under: Sex Toys

Tags: , ,

14 Oct

1 Comment

Hot Men Make Me Want To Check My Boobs

by

The charity Rethink Breast Cancer wanted to encourage women to check their boobs regularly. Naturally, they decided the best way to do that was to have good looking, shirtless men talk about it on a Youtube video. And damn, if I don’t feel the sudden urge to go searching for lumps right now.

It’s a bit cheesy but it did make me laugh… and wish that my doctor stripped off like Dr Rutherford. This article says the video has been an unexpected success for the campaign.

The only disappointing thing is the moment at 1:19 when it looks like we’re about to get some hot man-on-man action. But it’s only suggested… I guess they’re trying to keep it relatively tame.

So enjoy and yes, check those breasts, girls.

11 Oct

0 Comments

My Encounter With A Flasher

by

FlasherTwo nuns are sitting on a park bench. Suddenly, a flasher comes up, opens his coat and exposes himself. One nun has a stroke. The other can’t reach that far.

The image of the flasher – a man who flashes his genitals at unsuspecting women – is fairly entrenched in our culture. He’s the guy with a long overcoat, bare legs and a furtive look in his eye. Flashers are common in jokes and sketch comedy, perhaps because the whole thing is more than a little ludicrous. The image of a bloke opening his jacket and running off just appeals to comedic sensibilities.

So when I encountered my first flasher a couple of weeks ago, I was almost disappointed he wasn’t accompanied by Benny Hill music.

The incident occurred while I was on holiday in France. Now France isn’t known for it’s enlightened approach to women and so perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised by it. But to be honest, I was a little flabbergasted by the experience.

We had rented a canal boat for a week and were moored at a shady caravan park along the river, one attached to a rather small and inconsequential village. It was a warm day, too hot to sit on the little boat, so I decided to sit at a park bench under a tree near the park office, which was unattended. I had my netbook with me and thought I’d do a bit of writing.

As I walked over to the park bench, I noticed a guy walking along near me but didn’t pay him much attention. As I set up my computer, I did notice that he’d walked around the other side of the office, which is mostly glass. I wondered if maybe he worked at the park and was about to open the office.

And that’s when I noticed that he’d pushed the front of his pants down and was waving his tackle at me, through the glass.

Being the evil pornographer that I am, I can say the said tackle wasn’t terribly impressive. Average length, uncircumcised and – strangely – very floppy. Aren’t flashers supposed to be turned on by waving it at strangers?

When I realised what he was doing, I rolled my eyes and turned away, muttering “Jeez”. I realised I was being flashed at and felt kind of offended by it. The next impulse I had was to grab my camera but unfortunately I didn’t have it on me. For a millisecond I wondered how to make the webcam on my netbook work.

Then the fear kicked in. What if he was coming towards me? Should I be ready to run? What were his intentions? Another millisecond later I realised that it was broad daylight, there were people very close by and I was actually quite safe.

So the next thing to do was to make him go away by drawing attention to him. Turning back I waved my hand at him dismissively. “Go away, mate! Nobody wants to see that!” I said loudly. Given that he was French, he probably didn’t understand the words but he certainly got the message and began walking off rather quickly. When he turned back to look over his shoulder I held up my pinkie finger and wiggled it. Might as well make him feel bad while I was at it.

And bam, that was that. I’d been flashed at. No overcoats, no slapstick, just a creepy guy with his wang out.

It disturbed me, no doubt about it, but the lingering thought was one of disbelief that it had actually happened. I also found myself regretting that I hadn’t called out louder and yelled to the people in a nearby caravan. The guy was a sex offender; I shouldn’t have let him get away, really.

When I told my husband about it, he was stunned. It was so unexpected. And then he said “Did you have a stroke?” and we both laughed at the weirdness of it. After that I gave a general description of the guy and we actually got on our bikes and went looking for the flasher in the village in order to confront him. I wouldn’t have done this by myself, obviously, but my large, karate-instructor husband often inspires me to feel far more confident when in the company of creepy weirdos. By then the guy had disappeared.

So then I found myself pondering the reasons behind this man’s little escapade. What was he hoping to achieve? Because as a come-on or pick up line, flashing is wildly unsuccessful. Despite what porn may have people believe, women are highly unlikely to want sex after being given an eyeful of a stranger’s wang. Call us picky, but unasked-for exhibitions of unknown penises don’t really get the juices flowing.

A more satisfactory answer is that flashers want to exert power over someone else. They do this through shock, through inciting fear and also by pulling a social swifty; they violate unspoken but commonly understood social rules which means that the victim is left unsure how to interact.

Thus, my flasher saw me as someone who he could easily gain power over – I was an unaccompanied woman in a public place and, I’ll admit, I don’t cut a particularly imposing figure. When I yelled and waved my little finger at him, I took away his power and humiliated him.

Thus, I won.

In researching the reasons behind flashing I found a great site. It’s called Hollaback and it’s a global campaign to end street harrassment (and this includes flashing). The people behind the site are encouraging women to speak out against catcalls, harrassment and abuse on the street and – more importantly – to take photos of them. It’s about taking back power.

So now I really wish I’d had my camera with me. I could have outed him in front of thousands more people via the internet, all of whom, no doubt, would have waggled their little finger.

So that’s my flasher story. More amusing than traumatic, even if it is severely lacking in Benny Hill music.

Let this be a cautionary tale, my friends. Next time someone flashes you, or makes some ultra witty comment on the street, don’t duck your head and keep walking. Look them in the eye, waggle your little finger, tell them to fuck off and then take a photo. Take back your power and take back the streets. Because it’s time we stopped letting the creeps hassle us into silence. They’re creeps. Let’s let them know it.

03 Oct

3 Comments

Somebody Think Of The French Children!

by

French magazine with boobs on the cover
I’m back from a lovely month in France. I could bore you with a slide show of my adventures but I thought I’d put up this photo instead.

It was on display in a French newsagent on a low shelf. Where children could see it! Ack! Cue the moral outrage! How could this happen? Don’t they know that images of boobs irretrievably corrupt children and turn them into nasty, fire-breathing atheists, or something? Quick! something must be done! I’ll have to complain to a politician and demand greater censorship somehow.

I believe the model on the left is androgynous male model Andrej Pejic, whose image was recently censored in the US because he looks too female.

Interestingly, images of bare boobs seem to be relatively common in France. I saw some on a movie poster at a cinema complex, right next to a poster for the Smurf movie. I also spotted a nipple or two on a billboard advertising cars.

France is also delightfully blase about putting condom vending machines everywhere. You’ll find them on any street in larger cities. Voila:
Condom vending machines are everywhere in France
I took a pic of that one because of the sexy ad for skin cream behind it.

Seems that France doesn’t have much of an issue with public displays of sexuality. There’s no demand to hide it from children, no plaintive wails of “what will I say to my kids!” (or equivalent in French, although I suspect there’s no translation because the French don’t bother with such shit). Sex is part of life there and the French happily embrace it as part of the joie de vie.

It’s part of a wider culture difference I observed in that country, one that expects individuals to take responsibility for themselves. There are no signs on ruins warning you that it’s dangerous to climb on the ruins. The French think that if you choose to be an idiot, that’s your own problem. There are no signs telling you not to swing off ropes into the river or to walk along high walls. There are very few railings in high places. The one time I did see a sign warning of danger due to steep drops, it was telling parents to keep an eye on their kids.

So naturally there’s no ramped-up hysteria about the “sexualisation of children” and no concerns that a picture of a woman’s breast will somehow ruin a child’s life. Zey are boobs, zey are beautiful. What is ze problem?