<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strange Politics Of &#8220;Obscene&#8221; Bodily Fluids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Australia Bans Small Breasts (and female ejaculation) &#171; Ravings of a Lunatic Mum</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-182003</link>
		<dc:creator>Australia Bans Small Breasts (and female ejaculation) &#171; Ravings of a Lunatic Mum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 08:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-182003</guid>
		<description>[...] publications and films. It comes just a week after it was found that material with depictions of females ejaculating during orgasm are now Refused Classification and Australian Customs directed to confiscate it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publications and films. It comes just a week after it was found that material with depictions of females ejaculating during orgasm are now Refused Classification and Australian Customs directed to confiscate it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fools down under! &#124; News</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-179576</link>
		<dc:creator>fools down under! &#124; News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-179576</guid>
		<description>[...] publications and films. It comes just a week after it was found that material with depictions of females ejaculating during orgasm are now Refused Classification and Australian Customs directed to confiscate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publications and films. It comes just a week after it was found that material with depictions of females ejaculating during orgasm are now Refused Classification and Australian Customs directed to confiscate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-172682</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-172682</guid>
		<description>Hi i personally am concerned about idea of banning films of women ejaculating or any other form of film depicting fetishes; i feel it will drive things underground where it will only become a bigger problem and the people we are trying to protect will suffer even more. The idea that there are people in the community who practice fetishes in a safe way, don&#039;t have families is absurd. I am sure those same people will be doing the utmost to protect there most cherished asset. I think maybe we should burn books as well that way we be assured that we eradicate everything, oh whoops i almost forgot the most unseemly place of all the mind has anyone any suggestions of how to filter that, i was into fetishes at a young age long before i saw any adult material.
             Thank you for listening</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi i personally am concerned about idea of banning films of women ejaculating or any other form of film depicting fetishes; i feel it will drive things underground where it will only become a bigger problem and the people we are trying to protect will suffer even more. The idea that there are people in the community who practice fetishes in a safe way, don&#8217;t have families is absurd. I am sure those same people will be doing the utmost to protect there most cherished asset. I think maybe we should burn books as well that way we be assured that we eradicate everything, oh whoops i almost forgot the most unseemly place of all the mind has anyone any suggestions of how to filter that, i was into fetishes at a young age long before i saw any adult material.<br />
             Thank you for listening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-169416</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-169416</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, this should not be banned, they should at least label it saying the it has certain objects of sexual content, i believe that as long as it is for a certain cause then it should be alright, and if it is in private, and even though i am male i still think it is wrong for them to ban this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, this should not be banned, they should at least label it saying the it has certain objects of sexual content, i believe that as long as it is for a certain cause then it should be alright, and if it is in private, and even though i am male i still think it is wrong for them to ban this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-168560</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-168560</guid>
		<description>Bouquets by the truckload to Ms Naughty.

I am a lesbian ... I frequently ejaculate ... I know the difference between ejaculating/ejaculate and urinating/urine.

I will *not* let any male geek in a lab-coat 
- or his trained female pet of an assistant - tell me that I don&#039;t know what my body is doing.

Nor will I let a misogynist patriarch of a politician - or his docile female counterpart - tell me that the sight of men spraying their bodily fluids everywhere is acceptable and &#039;normal&#039;(even &#039;heroic&#039;) while I am a &#039;freak&#039; for doing the same!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bouquets by the truckload to Ms Naughty.</p>
<p>I am a lesbian &#8230; I frequently ejaculate &#8230; I know the difference between ejaculating/ejaculate and urinating/urine.</p>
<p>I will *not* let any male geek in a lab-coat<br />
- or his trained female pet of an assistant &#8211; tell me that I don&#8217;t know what my body is doing.</p>
<p>Nor will I let a misogynist patriarch of a politician &#8211; or his docile female counterpart &#8211; tell me that the sight of men spraying their bodily fluids everywhere is acceptable and &#8216;normal&#8217;(even &#8216;heroic&#8217;) while I am a &#8216;freak&#8217; for doing the same!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyciol</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-168172</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyciol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-168172</guid>
		<description>I have a question. If a man ejaculates into a woman and then it &#039;overflows&#039;, since it is fluid exiting a lady&#039;s virgina, does it also count as urine?

Also, if a woman is exercising in an aerobics video and gets very sweaty, if sweat gets on her short shorts, do they suppose it also might be urine and ban the aerobics video?

Food For Thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. If a man ejaculates into a woman and then it &#8216;overflows&#8217;, since it is fluid exiting a lady&#8217;s virgina, does it also count as urine?</p>
<p>Also, if a woman is exercising in an aerobics video and gets very sweaty, if sweat gets on her short shorts, do they suppose it also might be urine and ban the aerobics video?</p>
<p>Food For Thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyciol</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-168142</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyciol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-168142</guid>
		<description>We should defend women&#039;s rights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should defend women&#8217;s rights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australians Do Not Like Small Breast &#171; The Rogue Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-168131</link>
		<dc:creator>Australians Do Not Like Small Breast &#171; The Rogue Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-168131</guid>
		<description>[...] from being seen? Oh wait a minute is this part of the same fuckery legislation that led you guys to banning female ejaculation. Alright Australia thats the last straw. It looks like I am going to have to come over there (or is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from being seen? Oh wait a minute is this part of the same fuckery legislation that led you guys to banning female ejaculation. Alright Australia thats the last straw. It looks like I am going to have to come over there (or is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aufklärung 2010 &#124; aristophrenia</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167835</link>
		<dc:creator>Aufklärung 2010 &#124; aristophrenia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167835</guid>
		<description>[...] via [geekologie.com] [somebodthinkofthechildren.com] [msnaughty.com]   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [geekologie.com] [somebodthinkofthechildren.com] [msnaughty.com]   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Moments In Australian Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167773</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Moments In Australian Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167773</guid>
		<description>[...] while I&#8217;m waiting for the Classification Board to officially say that they don&#8217;t think female ejaculation is urine, I thought I&#8217;d compile a quick list of other things that have been banned by our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while I&#8217;m waiting for the Classification Board to officially say that they don&#8217;t think female ejaculation is urine, I thought I&#8217;d compile a quick list of other things that have been banned by our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Female Ejaculation Doesn&#8217;t Exist &#171; The Dawn Chorus</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167757</link>
		<dc:creator>Female Ejaculation Doesn&#8217;t Exist &#171; The Dawn Chorus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167757</guid>
		<description>[...] Ms. Naughty says: &#8220;One thing all the censors seem to agree on is that semen is an above-board bodily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ms. Naughty says: &#8220;One thing all the censors seem to agree on is that semen is an above-board bodily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Small Boobs Have Snowballed</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167756</link>
		<dc:creator>The Small Boobs Have Snowballed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167756</guid>
		<description>[...] posts: Female ejaculation films to be banned in Australia The strange politics of &#8220;obscene bodily fluids&#8221; Now Australia is banning small [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts: Female ejaculation films to be banned in Australia The strange politics of &#8220;obscene bodily fluids&#8221; Now Australia is banning small [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yail Bloor</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167752</link>
		<dc:creator>Yail Bloor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167752</guid>
		<description>The debate regarding female ejaculate is complex.  From your own source on the article pertaining to female ejaculate: Shannon Bell argues that the debate is confused by the discussion of two separate phenomena. In an extensive survey, Darling and colleagues claim support for the existence of ejaculation, while in a sharply critical response, Alzate states that direct experimentation fails to provide any evidence. Alzate states:

    the ignorance and/or confusion still prevalent among women about the anatomy and physiology of their sexual organs may make them mistake either vaginal lubrication or stress urinary incontinence for an &quot;ejaculation&quot;

Bell comments that Alzate simply dismisses women&#039;s subjective experiences in favour of rigorous scientific proof, and is typical of male sexologists withholding the validity of experience from women. Bell&#039;s critique lies at the heart of feminist concerns about this debate, namely a tendency to &quot;disregard, reinterpret, and overwrite women&#039;s subjective descriptions.&quot; For some, she states, it is more a matter of belief than of physiology.

In other words, the scientific view holds that female ejaculate MIGHT be urine.  I don&#039;t care either way.  What gets you off gets you off and that&#039;s your business.  But the science of the issue is far from clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate regarding female ejaculate is complex.  From your own source on the article pertaining to female ejaculate: Shannon Bell argues that the debate is confused by the discussion of two separate phenomena. In an extensive survey, Darling and colleagues claim support for the existence of ejaculation, while in a sharply critical response, Alzate states that direct experimentation fails to provide any evidence. Alzate states:</p>
<p>    the ignorance and/or confusion still prevalent among women about the anatomy and physiology of their sexual organs may make them mistake either vaginal lubrication or stress urinary incontinence for an &#8220;ejaculation&#8221;</p>
<p>Bell comments that Alzate simply dismisses women&#8217;s subjective experiences in favour of rigorous scientific proof, and is typical of male sexologists withholding the validity of experience from women. Bell&#8217;s critique lies at the heart of feminist concerns about this debate, namely a tendency to &#8220;disregard, reinterpret, and overwrite women&#8217;s subjective descriptions.&#8221; For some, she states, it is more a matter of belief than of physiology.</p>
<p>In other words, the scientific view holds that female ejaculate MIGHT be urine.  I don&#8217;t care either way.  What gets you off gets you off and that&#8217;s your business.  But the science of the issue is far from clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msnaughty</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167745</link>
		<dc:creator>msnaughty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167745</guid>
		<description>Have a look at my other site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornmoviesforwomen.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Porn Movies For Women&lt;/a&gt;. The &quot;lesbians&quot; page for example features plenty of films that would run afoul of Australia&#039;s censorship laws but they are made by real dykes authentically depicting their own sexuality. The Crash Pad Series is a website offering the same thing. With regards to straight films, I can&#039;t go past the amazing work of documentary maker Tony Comstock. His films are glorious and explore real relationships and real sex. He&#039;s already been a victim of the Classification Board - they banned two of his films from the Melbourne Underground Film Festival in the last couple of years. There&#039;s also the work of Petra Joy, Jennifer Lyon Bell (her film, Matinee, was banned from MUFF this year), Erika Lust, Joybear Pictures, Cinema Erotique and the very kinky people at Kink.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at my other site <a href="http://www.pornmoviesforwomen.com/" rel="nofollow">Porn Movies For Women</a>. The &#8220;lesbians&#8221; page for example features plenty of films that would run afoul of Australia&#8217;s censorship laws but they are made by real dykes authentically depicting their own sexuality. The Crash Pad Series is a website offering the same thing. With regards to straight films, I can&#8217;t go past the amazing work of documentary maker Tony Comstock. His films are glorious and explore real relationships and real sex. He&#8217;s already been a victim of the Classification Board &#8211; they banned two of his films from the Melbourne Underground Film Festival in the last couple of years. There&#8217;s also the work of Petra Joy, Jennifer Lyon Bell (her film, Matinee, was banned from MUFF this year), Erika Lust, Joybear Pictures, Cinema Erotique and the very kinky people at Kink.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quixotically</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2010/01/16/the-strange-politics-of-obscene-bodily-fluids/comment-page-1/#comment-167740</link>
		<dc:creator>quixotically</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=1658#comment-167740</guid>
		<description>Without sounding creepy I&#039;m interested in what these ground-breaking pornographic artists you&#039;ve found are. Alot of the stuff out their is dumb, Barbie dollheaded drivel unfortunately. Could you throuw us some links please, Ms Naughty? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without sounding creepy I&#8217;m interested in what these ground-breaking pornographic artists you&#8217;ve found are. Alot of the stuff out their is dumb, Barbie dollheaded drivel unfortunately. Could you throuw us some links please, Ms Naughty? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

