<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Porn, Censorship And Statistics Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/07/28/australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/07/28/australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: msnaughty</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/07/28/australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-121425</link>
		<dc:creator>msnaughty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=871#comment-121425</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a bit too blase about the filtering thing up to now because I thought it was technically impossible and that Labor were just trying to look busy for the Jesus freaks. But they&#039;re actually serious.

I read this page at Electronic Fronteirs Australia: http://www.efa.org.au/censorship/mandatory-isp-blocking/ The major flaw with the plan is the bit that requires the OFLC to classify every single site on the internet. When they realise that doesn&#039;t work they might go for automated content filtering. When we get to that point, the peasants may well revolt. And I&#039;ll be emigrating.

Interestingly, the ABC news had a story tonight on how China is censoring the internet and how it&#039;s pissing off the foreign journalists there. I desperately want someone in the media to point out that it&#039;s exactly what our own government is planning to inflict on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a bit too blase about the filtering thing up to now because I thought it was technically impossible and that Labor were just trying to look busy for the Jesus freaks. But they&#8217;re actually serious.</p>
<p>I read this page at Electronic Fronteirs Australia: <a href="http://www.efa.org.au/censorship/mandatory-isp-blocking/" rel="nofollow">http://www.efa.org.au/censorship/mandatory-isp-blocking/</a> The major flaw with the plan is the bit that requires the OFLC to classify every single site on the internet. When they realise that doesn&#8217;t work they might go for automated content filtering. When we get to that point, the peasants may well revolt. And I&#8217;ll be emigrating.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the ABC news had a story tonight on how China is censoring the internet and how it&#8217;s pissing off the foreign journalists there. I desperately want someone in the media to point out that it&#8217;s exactly what our own government is planning to inflict on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Meloni</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/07/28/australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-121421</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Meloni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=871#comment-121421</guid>
		<description>Wow. Cheers for the kind words Ms Naughty. 

@Alexis: It will almost certainly be based on a blacklist approach. ISP whitelisting for this sort of thing would be very difficult to manage. Much harder than say a email spam whitelist. Blacklisting filters were trialed and it&#039;s what they&#039;ll try to use. 

- Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Cheers for the kind words Ms Naughty. </p>
<p>@Alexis: It will almost certainly be based on a blacklist approach. ISP whitelisting for this sort of thing would be very difficult to manage. Much harder than say a email spam whitelist. Blacklisting filters were trialed and it&#8217;s what they&#8217;ll try to use. </p>
<p>- Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/07/28/australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-121273</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=871#comment-121273</guid>
		<description>If the Federal government does go for a whitelisting approach, one has to wonder what the criteria will be for getting on such a whitelist. For example, would merely linking to a site /not/ on the whitelist mean that the linking site itself could not be whitelisted?

If, on the other hand, they go for a blacklisting approach, would it end up like &lt;a href=&quot;http://facthai.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/finland-labels-princess-galyani-portrait-kiddie-porn-effi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Finnish list&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Federal government does go for a whitelisting approach, one has to wonder what the criteria will be for getting on such a whitelist. For example, would merely linking to a site /not/ on the whitelist mean that the linking site itself could not be whitelisted?</p>
<p>If, on the other hand, they go for a blacklisting approach, would it end up like <a href="http://facthai.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/finland-labels-princess-galyani-portrait-kiddie-porn-effi/" rel="nofollow">the Finnish list</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/07/28/australian-porn-censorship-and-statistics-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-121194</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=871#comment-121194</guid>
		<description>Thanks for compiling this info.  I have recently defended one of our local Adult boutiques on radio and in the local paper.  &quot;The Porn Report&quot; was a handy reference to have i will be sure to pilfer more of the info you have posted here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for compiling this info.  I have recently defended one of our local Adult boutiques on radio and in the local paper.  &#8220;The Porn Report&#8221; was a handy reference to have i will be sure to pilfer more of the info you have posted here <img src='http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

