<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porn For Women &#8211; The Backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/05/13/porn-for-women-the-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/05/13/porn-for-women-the-backlash/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=porn-for-women-the-backlash</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Female Gaze Does Not Exist?</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/05/13/porn-for-women-the-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-191552</link>
		<dc:creator>The Female Gaze Does Not Exist?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=742#comment-191552</guid>
		<description>[...] are) can have the effect of denying straight women their own space in the pornosphere. As I said in this post two and a half years ago, these phrases are about creating a space in an overwhelmingly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are) can have the effect of denying straight women their own space in the pornosphere. As I said in this post two and a half years ago, these phrases are about creating a space in an overwhelmingly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msnaughty</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/05/13/porn-for-women-the-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-191546</link>
		<dc:creator>msnaughty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=742#comment-191546</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting how the phrase is often thought to be somehow proscriptive but I don&#039;t see it that way. Of course a man can enjoy porn that is ostensibly intended for a female audience and can prefer it if he likes. And yes, it doesn&#039;t matter who makes it.  

As I mentioned in the original post, as porn moves away from the cliched, sexist straightjacket it has come to inhabit, we&#039;ll be talking less about &quot;porn for women&quot; and more about &quot;good porn&quot; versus &quot;bad porn.&quot;

Even though things have definitely improved since I first wrote this post two years ago, I still think the phrase is useful as a marker. Because the majority of porn is still aimed at men, gay or straight. And because sex is ultimately a gendered experience (and I include GBLT and genderqueer in that), I think you&#039;ll always get porn that reflects that particular experience or that speaks to that particular type of person. In that context, &quot;porn for women&quot; is pretty broad but I would still use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting how the phrase is often thought to be somehow proscriptive but I don&#8217;t see it that way. Of course a man can enjoy porn that is ostensibly intended for a female audience and can prefer it if he likes. And yes, it doesn&#8217;t matter who makes it.  </p>
<p>As I mentioned in the original post, as porn moves away from the cliched, sexist straightjacket it has come to inhabit, we&#8217;ll be talking less about &#8220;porn for women&#8221; and more about &#8220;good porn&#8221; versus &#8220;bad porn.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even though things have definitely improved since I first wrote this post two years ago, I still think the phrase is useful as a marker. Because the majority of porn is still aimed at men, gay or straight. And because sex is ultimately a gendered experience (and I include GBLT and genderqueer in that), I think you&#8217;ll always get porn that reflects that particular experience or that speaks to that particular type of person. In that context, &#8220;porn for women&#8221; is pretty broad but I would still use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobilis Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/05/13/porn-for-women-the-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-191542</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobilis Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=742#comment-191542</guid>
		<description>Is a man allowed to enjoy porn that was made &quot;for women&quot;?

Is a man allowed to prefer it?

Is a man allowed to make it?

Just asking questions here... because in the written erotica world, sometimes the answers are &quot;absolutely&quot;, &quot;of course&quot;, and &quot;no&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is a man allowed to enjoy porn that was made &#8220;for women&#8221;?</p>
<p>Is a man allowed to prefer it?</p>
<p>Is a man allowed to make it?</p>
<p>Just asking questions here&#8230; because in the written erotica world, sometimes the answers are &#8220;absolutely&#8221;, &#8220;of course&#8221;, and &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2008/05/13/porn-for-women-the-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-116721</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?p=742#comment-116721</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more!  While I definitely think there are problems with the term &quot;porn for women&quot; I would much rather go out and change perceptions of what that means than do away with it completely.  I think it&#039;s a useful term that gets people thinking about what some of the differences can be between the more mainstream, male-focused industry, and people who are making porn directed at a female audience.  Someday we&#039;ll just call it &quot;good porn&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more!  While I definitely think there are problems with the term &#8220;porn for women&#8221; I would much rather go out and change perceptions of what that means than do away with it completely.  I think it&#8217;s a useful term that gets people thinking about what some of the differences can be between the more mainstream, male-focused industry, and people who are making porn directed at a female audience.  Someday we&#8217;ll just call it &#8220;good porn&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

