<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, Google Screwed Me Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/well-google-screwed-me-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/well-google-screwed-me-too/</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Good Google Results? Check The Last Page : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/well-google-screwed-me-too/#comment-47109</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Good Google Results? Check The Last Page : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/well-google-screwed-me-too/#comment-47109</guid>
		<description>[...] posts on this topic: Well, Google screwed me too Ms Naughty is about porn for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts on this topic: Well, Google screwed me too Ms Naughty is about porn for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/well-google-screwed-me-too/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/well-google-screwed-me-too/#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>"no transparency about their process"

That's just not a fair statement IMO, as Danny Sullivan pointed out to her. Google has Matt Cutts, Adam Lasnik, and Vanessa Fox constantly responding to webmasters on forums. Not to mention we've got Google Group Webmaster Help where both Vanessa and Adam answers site-specific questions. It's also not a bad place to get some relatively informative feedback from other webmasters.

As for your blog, I know you're not asking for anyone's opinion, but I see 93 pages in the main index, and the rest in the supplemental index. I recommend putting nofollow on links like
www.msnaughty.com/blog/?feed=rss2 unless you really want them in the index.

I'd also put nofollow on affiliate links. For example, I'd nofollow that link to AEBN.

Last thing - the links to for the girls galleries probably help out forthegirls.com, but since they appear on every page, IMO they're hurting your blog. Again, I'd personally nofollow those links unless those galleries are in Google's main index and they're pulling in regular sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;no transparency about their process&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just not a fair statement IMO, as Danny Sullivan pointed out to her. Google has Matt Cutts, Adam Lasnik, and Vanessa Fox constantly responding to webmasters on forums. Not to mention we&#8217;ve got Google Group Webmaster Help where both Vanessa and Adam answers site-specific questions. It&#8217;s also not a bad place to get some relatively informative feedback from other webmasters.</p>
<p>As for your blog, I know you&#8217;re not asking for anyone&#8217;s opinion, but I see 93 pages in the main index, and the rest in the supplemental index. I recommend putting nofollow on links like<br />
<a href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/?feed=rss2</a> unless you really want them in the index.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also put nofollow on affiliate links. For example, I&#8217;d nofollow that link to AEBN.</p>
<p>Last thing - the links to <a target="_self" href="http://www.forthegirls.com">For The Girls</a> galleries probably help out forthegirls.com, but since they appear on every page, IMO they&#8217;re hurting your blog. Again, I&#8217;d personally nofollow those links unless those galleries are in Google&#8217;s main index and they&#8217;re pulling in regular sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
