<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porn For Women Retrospective 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/porn-for-women-retrospective-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/porn-for-women-retrospective-2006/</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: msnaughty</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/porn-for-women-retrospective-2006/#comment-11682</link>
		<dc:creator>msnaughty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/porn-for-women-retrospective-2006/#comment-11682</guid>
		<description>I've seen criticism of CAKE's commericalism before, and I can understand your point. CAKE does have an obvious commerical/marketing focus and, yes, it can be a little over the top. At the same time, I've interviewed Emily from CAKE and I believe she and Melinda really do have a feminist agenda. They really believe they are helping women and honestly want women to have better sex lives.

I too am something of a cunning capitalist. Making porn sites for women is how I earn my living, but I still consider myself a feminist, and I still want to help women to enjoy their sexuality. I don't think people automatically abandon all their ideals and ethics the moment they try to make money. I believe that it's possible for capitalism and feminism to co-exist.

I found the criticism of CAKE frustrating because it seems to imply that there is only one kind of empowerment for women, that there is some kind of "official feminist way" or "official female sexuality" and anything that deviates is not quite right. That's where I was coming from on this topic.

I did not see competitiveness in the statement "sex isn't over until we come" although I can see it might be read that way. For me that phrase is more about moving away from the penis-in-vagina version of sex, and saying that a woman's orgasm is just as important as a man's. If it's taken for granted that sex isn't over until a woman comes, then the woman has the power to say "You know, I'm not in the mood, you go ahead." That's a better circumstance than him rolling over and her lying there feeling pissed off because "sex is over."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen criticism of CAKE&#8217;s commericalism before, and I can understand your point. CAKE does have an obvious commerical/marketing focus and, yes, it can be a little over the top. At the same time, I&#8217;ve interviewed Emily from CAKE and I believe she and Melinda really do have a feminist agenda. They really believe they are helping women and honestly want women to have better sex lives.</p>
<p>I too am something of a cunning capitalist. Making porn sites for women is how I earn my living, but I still consider myself a feminist, and I still want to help women to enjoy their sexuality. I don&#8217;t think people automatically abandon all their ideals and ethics the moment they try to make money. I believe that it&#8217;s possible for capitalism and feminism to co-exist.</p>
<p>I found the criticism of CAKE frustrating because it seems to imply that there is only one kind of empowerment for women, that there is some kind of &#8220;official feminist way&#8221; or &#8220;official female sexuality&#8221; and anything that deviates is not quite right. That&#8217;s where I was coming from on this topic.</p>
<p>I did not see competitiveness in the statement &#8220;sex isn&#8217;t over until we come&#8221; although I can see it might be read that way. For me that phrase is more about moving away from the penis-in-vagina version of sex, and saying that a woman&#8217;s orgasm is just as important as a man&#8217;s. If it&#8217;s taken for granted that sex isn&#8217;t over until a woman comes, then the woman has the power to say &#8220;You know, I&#8217;m not in the mood, you go ahead.&#8221; That&#8217;s a better circumstance than him rolling over and her lying there feeling pissed off because &#8220;sex is over.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/porn-for-women-retrospective-2006/#comment-11646</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2007/01/06/porn-for-women-retrospective-2006/#comment-11646</guid>
		<description>Does it occur to people that the Cake issue is not so black and white? That some people find Cake offensive because they seem to be little more than cunning capitalists? Why is the Magic Wand thirteen dollars more on their site than it is on Betty Dodson's? Why at every turn do you realize when you read the fine print that they are turning your fantasies into profit? The minute anyone criticizes them they are suddenly against female sexual empowerment. Sex isn't over till we come? Is that the competitive atttitude we want to instill in women? Come one girls, scratch the surface a little harder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it occur to people that the Cake issue is not so black and white? That some people find Cake offensive because they seem to be little more than cunning capitalists? Why is the Magic Wand thirteen dollars more on their site than it is on Betty Dodson&#8217;s? Why at every turn do you realize when you read the fine print that they are turning your fantasies into profit? The minute anyone criticizes them they are suddenly against female sexual empowerment. Sex isn&#8217;t over till we come? Is that the competitive atttitude we want to instill in women? Come one girls, scratch the surface a little harder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
