<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ranch House Lust Review Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/09/18/ranch-house-lust-review-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/09/18/ranch-house-lust-review-notes/</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aqua Erotic</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/09/18/ranch-house-lust-review-notes/#comment-51680</link>
		<dc:creator>Aqua Erotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/09/18/ranch-house-lust-review-notes/#comment-51680</guid>
		<description>[...] the least. But you never know, Nina may have moved away from the stifling porn formula that made Ranch House Lust so excrutiatingly boring. Tags :adult films, erotica for women, Nina Lennox porn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the least. But you never know, Nina may have moved away from the stifling porn formula that made Ranch House Lust so excrutiatingly boring. Tags :adult films, erotica for women, Nina Lennox porn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Porn For Women Retrospective 2006 : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/09/18/ranch-house-lust-review-notes/#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Porn For Women Retrospective 2006 : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/09/18/ranch-house-lust-review-notes/#comment-11603</guid>
		<description>[...] Film Reviews This year I reviewed one porn movie a month for For The Girls. My favourites would have to be: Damon and Hunter Eyes of Desire City of Flesh 3 By far the worst was Ranch House Lust. God, there&#8217;s 90 minutes of my life that I want back. I was also pretty disappointed with the Playgirl movies, mainly because they still offer formulaic sex and don&#8217;t feature female orgasms. Perhaps the hottest film I watched was the Ultimate Guide To Anal Sex for Women, but it doesn&#8217;t make my &#8220;best&#8221; list thanks to the annoying presence of John Stagliano behind the camera. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Film Reviews This year I reviewed one porn movie a month for <a target="_self" href="http://www.forthegirls.com">For The Girls</a>. My favourites would have to be: Damon and Hunter Eyes of Desire City of Flesh 3 By far the worst was Ranch House Lust. God, there&#8217;s 90 minutes of my life that I want back. I was also pretty disappointed with the Playgirl movies, mainly because they still offer formulaic sex and don&#8217;t feature female orgasms. Perhaps the hottest film I watched was the Ultimate Guide To Anal Sex for Women, but it doesn&#8217;t make my &#8220;best&#8221; list thanks to the annoying presence of John Stagliano behind the camera. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
