<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eyes of Desire Review Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/</link>
	<description>Ms Naughty looks at porn for women, the adult industry and sex in general.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Porn For Women Retrospective 2006 : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-11602</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Porn For Women Retrospective 2006 : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-11602</guid>
		<description>[...] Film Reviews This year I reviewed one porn movie a month for For The Girls. My favourites would have to be: Damon and Hunter Eyes of Desire City of Flesh 3 By far the worst was Ranch House Lust. God, there&#8217;s 90 minutes of my life that I want back. I was also pretty disappointed with the Playgirl movies, mainly because they still offer formulaic sex and don&#8217;t feature female orgasms. Perhaps the hottest film I watched was the Ultimate Guide To Anal Sex for Women, but it doesn&#8217;t make my &#8220;best&#8221; list thanks to the annoying presence of John Stagliano behind the camera. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Film Reviews This year I reviewed one porn movie a month for <a target="_self" href="http://www.forthegirls.com">For The Girls</a>. My favourites would have to be: Damon and Hunter Eyes of Desire City of Flesh 3 By far the worst was Ranch House Lust. God, there&#8217;s 90 minutes of my life that I want back. I was also pretty disappointed with the Playgirl movies, mainly because they still offer formulaic sex and don&#8217;t feature female orgasms. Perhaps the hottest film I watched was the Ultimate Guide To Anal Sex for Women, but it doesn&#8217;t make my &#8220;best&#8221; list thanks to the annoying presence of John Stagliano behind the camera. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Playgirl&#8217;s Erotic Encounters Review Notes : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Playgirl&#8217;s Erotic Encounters Review Notes : Ms Naughty Porn for Women Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>[...] Previous review notes: Eyes of Desire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previous review notes: Eyes of Desire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC&#8217;s Blog on Comstock Films &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Porn for Beginners?</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>TC&#8217;s Blog on Comstock Films &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Porn for Beginners?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 20:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>[...] This exchange has been rattling around in my brain, knocking things loose until today when I visited Ms.Naughty&#8217;s blog. Her entry is ostensibly a warm review for Candida Royalle&#8217;s Eyes of Desire, but it&#8217;s got a few sharp words for the phrase &#8220;Good for couples and beginners&#8221;. Says Ms. Naughty: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This exchange has been rattling around in my brain, knocking things loose until today when I visited Ms.Naughty&#8217;s blog. Her entry is ostensibly a warm review for Candida Royalle&#8217;s Eyes of Desire, but it&#8217;s got a few sharp words for the phrase &#8220;Good for couples and beginners&#8221;. Says Ms. Naughty: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilded kage</title>
		<link>http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>gilded kage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msnaughty.com/blog/2006/04/29/eyes-of-desire-review-notes/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I read your funny and great article on why you hate the money shot, and I wrote this poem.

Traditional Porn Does Nothing For Me.

The money shot
said my friend
in one of our weekly convos about life
is the shot of the woman's crotch.
"Um..." I said, not wanting to offend,
and continued our talk in my head, as I often did,
Oh, you mean wide open beaver!
a term I first read in Vonnegut
a turnoff then, and now.

No, I thought
The money shot
is the ejaculation shot
the close-up as the man pulls out and comes
on the woman's breasts, face, or hair
as lights flash all around, and three yellow lemons
line up on the slots.
The money shot
shows male orgasm has arrived
which is, of course, the point of it all.
Not his face
not her release
not even her crotch
that curly beaver fur 
mere landscape, mere backdrop
in Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your funny and great article on why you hate the money shot, and I wrote this poem.</p>
<p>Traditional Porn Does Nothing For Me.</p>
<p>The money shot<br />
said my friend<br />
in one of our weekly convos about life<br />
is the shot of the woman&#8217;s crotch.<br />
&#8220;Um&#8230;&#8221; I said, not wanting to offend,<br />
and continued our talk in my head, as I often did,<br />
Oh, you mean wide open beaver!<br />
a term I first read in Vonnegut<br />
a turnoff then, and now.</p>
<p>No, I thought<br />
The money shot<br />
is the ejaculation shot<br />
the close-up as the man pulls out and comes<br />
on the woman&#8217;s breasts, face, or hair<br />
as lights flash all around, and three yellow lemons<br />
line up on the slots.<br />
The money shot<br />
shows male orgasm has arrived<br />
which is, of course, the point of it all.<br />
Not his face<br />
not her release<br />
not even her crotch<br />
that curly beaver fur<br />
mere landscape, mere backdrop<br />
in Mutual of Omaha&#8217;s Wild Kingdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
